| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
381. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: Tear extraction for the sake of tear extraction was never OK. This is the first time it got public ...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 05:11:00
|
382. Announcement:An Announcement Regarding Real Life Harassment - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Druthlen wrote: I took some time off from this game with all this nonsense. I could not in good conscience play a game were the owners allowed such events to occur. I think banning ero 1 was the right thing to do. I will never forget how sadist...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 05:02:00
|
383. Announcement:An Announcement Regarding Real Life Harassment - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
People need to really re-evaluate what in game and out of game is lol Talking to someone on TS while playing the game is IN GAME to me.
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 05:01:00
|
384. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: Tear extraction for the sake of tear extraction was never OK. This is the first time it got public enough to garner a response from the property owners. ...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 04:49:00
|
385. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ssabat Thraxx wrote: Deka Ekato wrote: Personally I choose Option 2 , with some added points, because there seems to be one too many defenders of E1's behaviour. These points can go something along the following lines :- - Using in game...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 04:47:00
|
386. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: Tear extraction for the sake of tear extraction was never OK. This is the first time it got public enough to garner a response from the property owners. BULLSHIT What was the advertised point of Hulkageddon? "T...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 03:02:00
|
387. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Muestereate wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Tut tut, Dinsdale. So we have to turn EVE into carebear heaven and shut out all the badfeelz, because of Star Citizen? Come on, you can do better than that. That is far from the quality trolling, ...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 02:05:00
|
388. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Deka Ekato wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Tell me, oh wonderful NPC corp alt, what is "griefing", precisely? If you need a precise explaination on what "griefing" is, then I am going to take the easy course of action and say, - That's CC...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 01:46:00
|
389. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Why not? Thats what happened here How do you know what happened here? Were you part of the process? Did CCP tell you? Aaah, the ostrich defense. If you dont see it it never happened. ...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 01:34:00
|
390. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Berendas wrote: Why not? Thats what happened here Darkopus wrote: Winchester Steele wrote: Toshiro Ozuwara wrote: [quote=Winchester Steele]He was being 'tortured' whether he thought so or not. CCP doesn't need any indication of ...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 00:59:00
|
391. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Muestereate wrote: They actually took their time and thought hard about not softening the sandbox. I don't really think they would have arrived at their decision without the public backlash and negative publicity and liabilities that were bein...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 00:58:00
|
392. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Berendas wrote: Troll Maximus wrote: Berendas wrote: However, in the wake of Erotica 1's assumed banning, I do not feel that CCP went by Malcanis's wording of option 2. To my mind they interfered where it was not necessary and their actio...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 00:53:00
|
393. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Troll Maximus wrote: Darth Badazz wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote: The sound clips have only been linked like 40 times in this thread for you to go educate yourself instead of speaking from ignorance Good point - CCP could provide ...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 00:17:00
|
394. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
olan2005 wrote: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4412145#post4412145 lol thats funny cause thats their equivalent of saying "We cant define it because youll break it" Or taking their ball and going home as far as the ...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.31 00:15:00
|
395. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ISD Ezwal wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Serious question; that includes CSMs, yes? To make things cristal clear: That goes for every single poster on this forum, regardless of status. Of course factors as topic, sub-forum, severity of ...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.30 23:56:00
|
396. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote: Darth Badazz wrote: cant generaliz this stuff too much. CCP needs to be more clear about what they do and do not allow They've been very clear. People just choose to be obtuse for the sake of trolling or because the...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.30 23:38:00
|
397. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Drakast wrote: Winchester Steele wrote: [quote=Antisocial Malkavian][quote=Drakast]option 1 and option 3 are extremes that wont work ( you knew that when you wrote them though) His transgressions don't count because Riptard didn't blog a...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.30 23:35:00
|
398. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Drakast wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Drakast wrote: option 1 and option 3 are extremes that wont work ( you knew that when you wrote them though) leaving only option 2 as the sensible decision. CCP handled this incident in the be...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.30 23:34:00
|
399. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ISD Ezwal wrote: I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil! On that note, please feel free to report any post that has broken the ...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.30 23:33:00
|
400. CSM Feedback to CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Drakast wrote: option 1 and option 3 are extremes that wont work ( you knew that when you wrote them though) leaving only option 2 as the sensible decision. CCP handled this incident in the best way. it wasnt the popular way for all the fr...
- by Antisocial Malkavian - at 2014.03.30 23:18:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |